PHL390 Philosophy of Technology
Spring Semester, 2012
|
|
Dr. Dennis M. Weiss
Office: HUM 154
Office Hours: MWF 12:00 - 12:50, Th 2:00 -
3:00, and by appointment
Office Phone: 815-1513
Course Description
The task for a philosophy of technology is to analyze the
phenomenon of technology, its significance, and the ways that it mediates and
transforms experience. Philosophy of technology is a critical, reflective
examination of the nature of technology as well as the effects and
transformation of technologies in human knowledge, activities, societies, and
environments. The aim of philosophy of technology is to understand, evaluate,
and criticize the ways in which technologies reflect as well as change human
life individually, socially, and politically.
Our world is largely a constructed environment; our
technologies and technological systems form the background, context, and medium
for our lives. Technology conditions and permeates virtually every human
experience. But because technology is everywhere we look, we are not always able
to see it. We need to render our technological experiences more visible, to
sharpen the conceptual tools with which we can explore the many meanings of
technology, and to advance the development of a common technological vocabulary.
The assumption underlying the philosophy of technology is
that the devices and substances we make and use transform our experience in ways
that are philosophically relevant. That is, technology not only enlarges and
extends our capacities and effects changes in the natural and social worlds but
does so in ways that are interesting with respect to fundamental areas of
philosophical inquiry.
The goal of this course is to help us critically examine the impact of
technology on our lives and address several key questions about technology,
thereby arriving at a more reflective understanding of the nature of technology.
Key questions we will consider include:
- Is technology an autonomous force in culture and society, subject to its
own laws?
- Does technology help us progress or is it a hindrance to our social and
cultural development?
- Does technology have an essence or must we deal with particular
technological artifacts?
- What is the impact of technology on our social, cultural, and political
lives.
Textbooks
-
Arnold Pacey: The Culture of Technology
-
Albert Borgmann: Technology and the Character of Contemporary
Life
-
Judy Wajcman: Feminism Confront Technology
Additional readings from the WWW, hyperlinked to the
syllabus
or available through Schmidt Library
Grading
| 3 Short Essays @ 100 points each (approximately 1000 words) |
300 points |
| Course Essay (3000 words) |
300 points |
| Micro Essays |
100 points |
| Class Participation |
200 points |
| Extra Curricular Activities |
20 points |
| Total Available Points |
920 points |
Short Essays
Throughout the semester, three short essays requiring synthesis of
our readings and discussions will be assigned. These essays are to be
approximately 1000 words in length, typed, double-spaced, with standard fonts and margins. Topics
and due dates will be announced in class. Late essays will be accepted up to one
week past the due date, but they
will be penalized five points for every day late. No exceptions will be made to
this policy.
Course Essay
To further develop your interests in philosophy of technology
and your critical philosophical skills in analyzing technology, I will ask each
of you to address an assigned course issue to be decided. This essay should be
approximately 3000 words in length. Further information on this aspect of the course will be discussed
in class. We'll prepare our essays with the intention of submitting some of them
to a call for papers from the
Humanities and Technology Association.
Daily Micro Essays
You should immediately purchase a small package of
4x6
index cards (no smaller). With each new reading assignment, prior to that
reading being discussed in class, I will ask you to write a brief, "micro"
essay, usually analyzing some aspect of that day's reading assignment. Sometimes
I will simply ask you to record your philosophical reactions to the reading.
These micro essays serve a number of purposes: they motivate you to complete the
reading and come to class, help to focus your reading, provide a study guide for
your midterm and final, and stimulate class discussion. You should be prepared
to share your micro essays with other members of the class during our class
discussions. Your essays should be approximately150 words in length. Each day I
will collect your card, review your essay to determine that you have adequately
completed the assignment, record your having completed it, and return them to
you the following class day. At the end of the semester I will award up to 100
points for these micro essays, deducting five points for each one you failed to
turn in.
- Essays must be completed before
coming to class.
- No essays completed at the start of class or during class will
be accepted.
- Essays can only be turned in on those days that you attend class.
- You cannot have other students turn your essays in for you.
- You can miss two micro essays without penalty.
- If you miss no micro essays during the
semester, I will award you 10 points for your good performance.
Class Participation
In her article "Feminist Epistemology" Naomi Scheman argues that it is misleading to think of epistemic
agency as ideally exercised in solitude. Knowing and coming to know, Scheman
contends, are social and interactive. "They are things we
do, and
things we are appropriately held responsible for doing, in social and cultural
settings that variously help and hinder our doing them well." I
wholeheartedly agree with Scheman that knowing is a practice that ideally
occurs in a social setting. Each of us is responsible for participating in a
variety of communities of knowers and it is a responsibility we ought to take
seriously. Our class is one such community, a community in which we must
actively participate in the social practice of knowing. To encourage your
participation in this community of learners and to encourage you to come to
class prepared to discuss that day’s issues, at the end of the semester, you
will receive a grade based on your class participation throughout the
semester. The grade you receive will be based on, among other things, your
regular attendance, your improvement over the course of the semester, and, to
the greatest extent, your willingness to contribute in a meaningful way to the
daily class discussion. Other indices of an engaged student include:
- Your willingness to engage the texts and issues associated with the
course in the spirit of learning more about yourself and the world you
live in.
- Your ability to respect a diversity of opinion as demonstrated by
conducting yourself in a civil manner and by refraining from interruptions
and ridicule of others.
- Your ability to listen and participate during class.
- Your ability to offer relevant, on-topic commentary.
- Your ability to arrive at class on time and prepared.
- Your ability to focus on class during class time. Habitual entrances and
exits during class sessions will result in a grade penalty, as will
holding private discussions during class and disruptions arising from cell
phones, watches, pagers, and the like.
- Your ability to avoid complaining and asking questions whose answers
have already been provided (e.g., “Can I make up the quiz?” and
“What is the response for next time?”).
- Your ability to let me know ahead of time if you have to miss an
appointment or conference.
The following is meant only as a rough guide as to how your
participation grade will be determined:
|
180 - 200 points
|
Participates voluntarily and frequently. Is regularly engaged in the
class discussions. Shows a good grasp of the
material and good preparation.
|
|
160 - 179 points
|
Participates voluntarily with less frequency but still makes an
important contribution to the class discussion.
|
|
140 - 159 points
|
Participates voluntarily but shows a lesser grasp of the material or
little preparation.
|
|
120 - 139 points
|
Participates only when asked to do so.
|
|
119 points or less
|
Does not participate or is frequently absent.
|
Please review the following links:
Activities outside of regular class hours
As part of the regular course requirements, you will be expected to
occasionally participate in events outside of the regular class hours. You may
be asked to watch videos on your own time and attend evening events. Additionally, as part of the
English and Humanities Department's efforts to encourage student participation
in college cultural activities, I will ask that you attend two events during the semester.
Following your attendance at each event, within one week you must submit a brief
reflection on what you observed, for which I will award you 10 points apiece. At
least one of these events must be sponsored by the English and Humanities
Department, and can include lectures, Players' productions, etc. More information concerning this will be provided in class.
My YCP and E-Mail Addresses
You are expected to have an active York College e-mail address and to check
it regularly during the semester. I will send e-mail only to your ycp.edu
address. If you wish to use other addresses, such as private internet service
provided addresses, you should set up your YCP address so that it automatically
forwards your mail to that address. We will also use some of the features of My
YCP to engage in online discussion. If you are not familiar with MY YCP, you
should familiarize yourself with the program.
Your Responsibilities
It is your responsibility to
remain apprised of all assignments and any changes in the syllabus or grading
policies. I reserve the right to make changes to class policies and the syllabus
as I deem necessary. I expect that you will be in class daily, having prepared
your work and ready to discuss the material.
You should obtain the names
and contact information from several of
your fellow classmates so that you have someone to contact if you must miss
class. You should not depend on either e-mailing or phoning me to learn what you
missed in class or find out your assignment for the following class.
You should strictly observe the
following policies:
- Attendance is not optional but strictly required.
- Class begins promptly at the appointed time. Don’t be late.
- Students should come to class prepared, having read and completed
the day’s assignment, ready to discuss it.
- There is to be no sleeping in class. Stay awake and alert.
- Do not leave the room during the class period without prior
permission.
- Do not carry on private conservations while class is in progress.
- Treat all class members with respect and civility.
- Make sure that all cell phones and other electronic equipment is turned
off.
I have prepared some material to help you in reading and writing
philosophy. If you are having difficulty with your class readings or writing
assignments, you might wish to review the following material.
If you are interested in exploring philosophy on the web
further, you might begin with the links I have collected on the following web
page:
Studying Philosophy at York College
Syllabus
(subject to change)
Weeks One and Two: Introduction to Course
1/19 Technology and Culture
1/24 The iPod and the Culture of Music
- The iPod and the Culture of Music
- Micro Essay: Do you think the iPod has had an impact on the culture of
music? If so, has it been positive, negative, a mixture of both?
- Optional Readings:
- Discussion of Course Policies and Syllabus
1/26 Thinking About Technology
- Technology Presentation
- READ:
David Nye: Technology
- Optional Readings. There are a couple good encyclopedia articles that
introduce philosophy of technology:
- Micro Essay: How does David Nye's short reflections on technology help
us better understand how to think about technoloygy?
Week Three: Technology and Applied Matters
1/31 Is Google Making Us Stoopid?
2/2 The Internet's Impact on Culture and Society
- RESOURCES:
- Micro Essay: Keeping in mind the four tracks for the HTA (which
you can access here), suggest a fairly developed and precise issue the
class might address in their course essays.
Week Four: Classical Theories of Technology
2/7 Jacques Ellul
- READ:
- Additional Selections:
- Micro Essay: On the front of your index card, see if you can explain in
your own words what Ellul means by the autonomy of technique. On the reverse
side of the card, see if you can identify a contemporary example (perhaps
one from your own life) of the autonomy of technique.
2/9 Hans Jonas
Week Five: Heidegger and Philosophy of Technology
2/14
- READ:
- Micro Essay: Let's try and see if we can make sense of the differences
according to Heidegger between ancient/traditional technologies and modern
technologies. Think about the contrast between the windmill and the
hydroelectric plant or between the fine bone china tea cup and the Styrofoam
cup (mentioned in class and in the essay by Dreyfus) and briefly write about
how these objects call forth different relationships to the world.
- Heidegger and
Technology Links
2/16
- READ: Heidegger: The Question Concerning Technology
- Micro Essay: Why does Heidegger see modern technology and enframing as
dangerous? Do you agree with him?
- Further Notes on Heidegger and Technology
- Hubert Dreyfus Essays:
Week Six: Radical Evolution
2/21
- READ: Joel Garreau, Radical Evolution, Chapters 1 - 3, The
Heaven Scenario (pp. 130 - 31), The Hell Scenario (pp. 184 - 85), The Prevail Scenario
(pp. 224 - 25)
- Micro Essay: Reading Garreau through the lens of either Ellul, Jonas, OR
Heidegger (select one), how do you think your chosen philosopher would
assess Garreau's discussion of technology and the human condition?
2/23
- There's no class today as I am away at a conference.
- ESSAY ONE
Week Seven: Winter Break
Weeks Eight and Nine: Albert Borgmann
3/6
- READ: Borgmann: pages 1 - 7, 33 - 56
- Micro Essay: no micro essay due today.
- Your first essay is due today.
3/8
- READ: Borgmann: Chapters 14 (85 - 93), 15, 16
- Micro Essay: In analyzing liberalism, technology, and the good life,
Borgmann states that "liberalism is one with the device paradigm." What does
he mean by this and do you agree with his assessment of liberalism?
3/13
- READ: Borgmann : Chapters 21 (pages 176 - 182) and 22
- Micro Essay: What role do wilderness and deictic discourse play in the
reform of technology, according to Borgmann?
3/15
- READ: Borgmann: Chapters 23, 24, 26
- Micro Essay: Borgmann notes that a device does not engage or even permit
engagement (113), that technology does not have focal character (208), and
that the focal significance of work with computers is precarious (217).
Thinking about your own engagement with the digital culture (in gaming or
social networking or other engagements), do you agree or disagree with his
assessment of digital devices?
Weeks Ten and Twelve: Arnold Pacey
3/20 Borgmann and the Posthuman
- John Braught:
Borgmann and
Transhumanism
-
Borgmann and Hayles Discussion (Optional)
- Micro Essay: Think about Garreau's Hell scenario (and maybe reread that
section of his book) and consider how Borgmann's account of technology and
the character of contemporary life might inform a deeper understanding and
appreciation of the problems associated with the application of converging
technologies to the human being.
3/22 Arnold Pacey
- READ: Chapters 1 and 2
- Micro Essay: How does Pacey's definition of technology in terms of
technology practice suggest a necessary rethinking of the notion of
technological progress?
3/27 Arnold Pacey
- READ: Chapters 3 and 5
- Micro Essay: How does Pacey's discussion of both expertise and
imperatives help us to deepen our understanding of the notion of the
converging GRIN technologies?
3/29 Arnold Pacey
- READ: Chapters 6 and 7
- Micro Essay: What does the discipline of reversal have to do with values
and technology and how does it distinguish Pacey's reform of technology from
Borgmann's?
- Your abstract is due today.
4/3 Arnold Pacey
- READ: Chapters 8 and 9
- Micro Essay: What does Pacey mean by cultural revolution (chapter 9) and
what might the impact of such a revolution be on our understanding of
converging technologies?
- ESSAY TWO
4/5 Spring Break
Weeks Thirteen and Fourteen: Women, Gender, and Technology
4/10 Wajcman
- READ: chapters 1 and 2, focusing your attention on the first chapter
- Micro Essay:
4/12 Wajcman
- READ: chapter 3
- Micro Essay: Identify some of the methods and/or principles Wacjman
employs in analyzing reproductive technologies and consider how these same
methods and/or principles could usefully be applied to an analysis of NBIC
(GRIN) technologies.
4/17 Wajcman
- READ: chapter 4
- Micro Essay: Based on your reading and understanding of Wajcman's
analysis of domestic technology, how would she assess Borgmann's account of
technology in terms of the device paradigm?
4/19 Wajcman
- READ: chapter 6 and the conclusion
- Micro essay: How can we apply Wajcman's insights about the social
shaping of technology and the culture of masculinity to an analysis of GRIN
technologies as Garreau discusses them?
Weeks Fifteen and Sixteen: Andrew Feenberg and Critical Theories of Technology
4/24 Andrew Feenberg
4/26 Feenberg
- READ:
"From Essentialism to Constructivism" (pages 304 - 313)
- Micro Essay: Towards the end of this essay, Feenberg contrasts a notion
of technology that is fundamentally Promethean and one that "gathers" where
technical processes are brought into compliance with the requirements of
nature or human health (313). Given this contrast, how do you think Feenberg
would analyze Garreau's account of the GRIN technologies?
5/1 Feenberg
5/3
Some topics and reading selections covered in previous
iterations of this course
The Coming Singularity
Additional links for further information:
Additional links for further information
Community and Technology/Borgmann and the Posthuman
Virtual Community
The Posthuman
Borgmann and Obama: Politics, Engagement, and Technology
The Amish and Technology
Sex, Gender, and Technology: Robbie Davis-Floyd
Susan Squier
Langdon Winner
- READ:
- Micro Essay:
- Additional Resources: